Waterfall methodology Vs Agile Methodology
Waterfall methodology means:
The Waterfall methodology is an approach to project
management that follows a linear, sequential process. This approach is popular
in software engineering and is called Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC).
However, product development is also utilizing this model.
The term “waterfall” refers to the flow of the
project, where each phase cascades down to the next. It involves a detailed
planning phase, execution, testing, and maintenance. And each phase must be completed
before moving on to the next, with little to no flexibility for changes during
the project.
Key
Characteristics of waterfall method
· Linear
and Sequential Process:
The Waterfall model follows a strict
sequence of phases, each dependent on the completion of the previous one. This
means that you cannot move to the next phase until the current one is fully
completed.
· Distinct
Phases:
The process is divided into distinct
and non-overlapping phases, typically including:
· Requirements
Gathering and Analysis: Collect and document all the requirements for the
project.
· System
Design: Define the system architecture and design based on the requirements.
· Implementation
(Coding): Develop the actual software code.
· Integration
and Testing: Integrate and test the complete system to find and fix defects.
· Deployment:
Deploy the system into the production environment.
· Maintenance:
Perform ongoing maintenance and updates after the system is live.
· Documentation:
Extensive documentation is created at
each phase, providing a detailed record of the project's progress and
decisions.
· No
Overlapping Phases:
Each phase must be completed before the next one begins, with no iterations or revisiting previous phases.
Drawbacks
of Waterfall method:
· Inflexibility:
The Waterfall model follows a strict
sequential process where each phase must be completed before the next begins.
This makes it difficult to accommodate changes once the project is underway,
leading to potential issues if requirements evolve.
· Late
Testing:
Testing is typically deferred until
after the development phase is complete. This can result in the late discovery
of defects, which can be costlier and time-consuming to fix than if they were
identified earlier in the process.
· Assumes
Stable Requirements:
The Waterfall model assumes that
requirements can be clearly defined and understood upfront. In reality,
requirements often change during a project due to evolving business needs,
technological advancements, or new insights.
· Lack
of Customer Involvement:
Customer feedback is usually gathered
only at the beginning (requirements phase) and end (final product delivery) of
the project. This limited interaction can lead to a final product that does not
fully meet the customer's needs or expectations.
· Long
Project Timelines:
Because the Waterfall model requires
each phase to be completed before the next begins, projects can have long
timelines. This can be problematic for projects that require quicker turnaround
times or that operate in rapidly changing markets
· Risk
of Overlooked Requirements:
If requirements are not thoroughly
understood or documented at the outset, it can lead to gaps in functionality.
Since the Waterfall model does not easily accommodate changes, these gaps can
significantly impact the final product.
· Integration
Issues:
Integration is typically left until
the end of the project, which can lead to significant challenges and issues if
different system components do not work together as expected.
· Documentation
Heavy:
The Waterfall methodology places a
strong emphasis on documentation, which can be time-consuming and may not
always add value. Over-reliance on documentation can also slow down the
project.
· Poor
Visibility into Progress:
Because the model follows a linear
path, stakeholders may have limited visibility into the project's progress
until the later stages, making it harder to identify and address issues early
on.
· Not
Suitable for Complex and Long-Term Projects:
For large, complex, and long-term projects, the Waterfall model can be less effective due to its rigidity and difficulty in accommodating changes over time.
When to use Waterfall methodology
· Established
Project Requirements
Waterfall management may be the better choice if you have a clear objective in mind for your project. However, suppose the end goal is unclear, and there are ambiguous requirements or potential changes in direction. In that case, other project management methodologies may be the best approach for you or your clients.
· Well-Defined
Project Tasks and Deadlines
The waterfall model is a structured methodology. Hence, this methodology is designed for businesses prioritizing meeting deadlines, some examples are the construction or manufacturing industry.
· You
Have Plenty of Time to Plan
Waterfall management requires
significant time allocated to the first two stages. If you have enough time to
gather requirements and plan, you may opt for the waterfall approach. However,
utilizing other methodologies may suit those with time constraints.
Agile methodology means
Agile project management is a flexible and iterative
approach that enables teams to quickly adapt to changing project requirements
and deliver high-quality results within shorter timeframes. It’s very often
used in software development.
Agile methodologies are about teamwork, customer
satisfaction, constant refinement, and breaking big projects into bite-sized
pieces. By prioritizing collaboration and communication, agile processes enable
teams to pivot and respond to evolving customer needs while maintaining a high
level of flexibility. The focus on continuous improvement means that teams are
always seeking ways to optimize their processes and deliver the best possible
results.
Ultimately, the agile methodology is about producing
better outcomes through a more streamlined and adaptive approach.
There some frameworks implemented in Agile
principle including:
· Scrum:
Scrum is one of the most popular
Agile frameworks. It organizes work into sprints (typically 2-4 weeks) with
defined roles (Scrum Master, Product Owner, Development Team) and ceremonies
(Sprint Planning, Daily Stand-up, Sprint Review, Sprint Retrospective).
· Kanban:
Kanban focuses on visualizing the
workflow, limiting work in progress, and optimizing the flow of tasks through
the system. It uses a Kanban board with columns representing different stages
of work.
· Lean:
Lean principles aim to maximize value
by eliminating waste, improving flow, and continuously improving processes.
Why Agile better than Waterfall
Flexibility
and Adaptability
Agile methodologies are designed to be highly
adaptable to changing requirements. Agile embraces change and allows project
teams to adjust their focus and priorities in response to new information or
evolving business needs. Iterative development cycles (sprints) enable
continuous feedback and improvement.
The Waterfall model is rigid and follows a linear
sequence of phases, making it difficult to accommodate changes once the project
is underway. Changes in requirements after the initial phases can lead to
significant rework and increased costs.
Customer
Collaboration and Feedback
Agile emphasizes close collaboration with customers
and stakeholders throughout the development process. Regular feedback loops (e.g.,
through sprint reviews and demos) ensure that the product meets customer needs
and expectations.
Customer involvement is typically limited to the
requirements phase and final delivery, which can result in a product that does
not fully align with customer expectations.
Early
and Continuous Delivery of Value
Agile methodologies prioritize delivering small,
usable increments of the product early and continuously. This ensures that
stakeholders receive value throughout the project lifecycle. By delivering
working software early, teams can validate assumptions and reduce risks.
In the Waterfall model, the product is delivered only
at the end of the project after all phases are completed. This can lead to long
lead times before any value is delivered.
Improved
Quality and Risk Management
Agile practices such as continuous integration,
automated testing, and regular retrospectives help maintain high quality and
identify issues early. Frequent testing and review cycles allow for early
detection and resolution of defects.
Testing typically occurs only after the development phase,
which can result in late discovery of defects. Fixing these defects late in the
project can be costly and time-consuming.
Empowered
and Motivated Teams
Agile methodologies promote self-organizing and
cross-functional teams, giving team members more autonomy and ownership of
their work. Regular retrospectives and continuous improvement practices help
teams identify and address issues, fostering a positive and collaborative work
environment.
The hierarchical and sequential nature of Waterfall
can lead to less empowerment for team members and may not foster the same level
of collaboration and innovation.
Visibility
and Transparency
Agile practices such as daily stand-ups, sprint
reviews, and progress tracking tools (e.g., burndown charts) provide high
visibility into the project’s progress. Stakeholders can regularly see the
progress and provide input, reducing misunderstandings and aligning
expectations.
In Waterfall, progress visibility is often limited
until the later stages of the project. This can result in stakeholders being
unaware of issues or changes in scope until it is too late to address them
effectively.
Better
Alignment with Modern Development Practices
Agile is well-suited to modern software development
practices, which emphasize rapid iteration, continuous delivery, and
responsiveness to change. Practices like DevOps and continuous delivery
pipelines align well with Agile principles, enhancing the ability to deliver
high-quality software quickly.
The traditional Waterfall model does not easily
accommodate modern practices such as continuous integration and continuous
delivery, which rely on frequent iterations and feedback loops.
Product Owner
Product owners manage the product roadmap and
prioritize the backlog. They also define the product vision and manage
stakeholders. They have the authority to make key decisions and in particular,
are responsible for making sure the team is working on the right items. It is
helpful for the product owner to be able to communicate effectively with
stakeholders. The Product owner should be able to understand what customers
want and make adjustments accordingly. They can liaise between engineering and
business teams, and they can offer insights to marketing and sales teams about
the product if needed.
Business Analyst
Works with the Product Owner and stakeholders to gather
and refine requirements and helps translate business needs into technical specifications.
He Ensures the Scrum framework is followed by
facilitating ceremonies like daily stand-ups, sprint planning, sprint reviews,
and retrospectives and Guides the team on Agile practices and principles to
improve their effectiveness and efficiency.
Development Team
Responsible for delivering potentially shippable
product increments at the end of each sprint. They work closely with the
Product Owner and Scrum Master to understand requirements and ensure quality
and also Participates in retrospectives to reflect on their work and processes
to identify improvements.
Tester/QA Engineer
Ensures the quality of the product through testing and
validation and works closely with the development team to identify and fix
defects early.
UI Designer
Focuses on the user experience and interface design
and works with the Product Owner and development team to ensure the product is
user-friendly and meets design standards.
Stakeholders
Represent the interests of the customers or the business and Provide input and feedback on the product that developed.
What is an Agile ceremony?
An Agile ceremony is an event in the Agile process
when your team meets to discuss what their next course of action is. It’s a
fancy term to describe a normal meeting during the Agile process. The primary
focus of an Agile ceremony is to increase communication within an Agile or
Scrum team to ensure everyone is on the same page. These ceremonies are often
facilitated by product owners or Scrum masters. There are 5 main agile
ceremonies. They are Sprint Planning, Daily Stand-Up, Sprint Review, Sprint
Retrospective, Product Backlog Refinement.
This is the event that kick starts each Sprint and is
where the Product Owner and Developers discuss which Product Backlog Items
(PBI’s) will be included in Sprint. While the Product Owner has the right to priorities
each PBI for potential inclusion in the Sprint, the Developers are encouraged
to respond, raise issues and push back where necessary. The Developers then
forecasts how many PBI’s they can deliver in the Sprint, given their knowledge
of velocity, resources and any factors which could influence the time and
resources they have available. The outcome of the Sprint Planning event is to
get a Sprint Goal and Sprint Backlog that everyone agrees is realistic and
achievable. Entire Scrum team participate for this meeting. That means Product
Owner, Scrum Master, Development Team will participate for this.
Daily Stand-Up
These daily check-ups help teams stay on track and
mark progress. Each morning, team members discuss what they worked on
yesterday, what they’re doing today, and what’s blocking them from moving forward.
Development team and Scrum Master will participate for this meeting.
Sprint Review
The sprint review ceremony happens as the sprint comes
to a close. This is the opportunity for the team to show off the completed
work, gather feedback, and adjust their future plans. The review ceremony is
time-boxed to four hours for a one-month sprint, though it is usually shorter
for shorter sprints.
All relevant parties attend this meeting, even beyond
the scrum team. Aside from the scrum master, product owner, and development
team, other relevant stakeholders such as clients or users can join.
In essence, this scrum ceremony exists for two
reasons: demonstration and feedback. Meeting attendees can ask questions and
see the results of the team’s hard work. The product owner reviews the current
state of the product backlog and takes into account any new insights, feedback,
or changes in priorities from the meeting attendees.
Then, based on the feedback received, the product
owner and the development team discuss any necessary changes to the product
backlog and identify potential backlog items for the upcoming sprint. This
discussion helps the team align their future plans with stakeholder
expectations and ensures that they continue to deliver value in subsequent
sprints.
Sprint Retrospective
The sprint retrospective really captures the essence
of scrum in that it serves as a way to promote continuous learning and
development. The development team participates in the sprint retrospective and
the scrum master facilitates the meeting. The idea is to transparently assess
performance, identify areas for improvement, and create actionable plans for
the upcoming sprint.
These actionable plans are items that can be
implemented as soon as the next sprint. The team needs to collaborate on these,
and the action items may include changes to the team’s processes, tools, or
ways of working. The goal is to make measurable improvements that will
positively impact the team’s performance and the product’s development. The
entire sprint retrospective is time-boxed to a max of three hours, but it can
be less depending on the length of the sprint.
Product Backlog Refinement.
The purpose of this scrum ceremony is to clean and
prioritize the backlog. During this meeting, the product owner and some of the
team members review the backlog items together. There’s no time limit to this
ceremony, but it’s recommended to only dedicate one hour per week to product
backlog refinement. Some teams like to do this to help keep them organized and
smooth out the sprint planning process for the next sprint.
Comments
Post a Comment